Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Ulrika Ericson

Ulrika Ericson

Associate professor

Ulrika Ericson

Nutritional quality of food as represented by the FSAm-NPS nutrient profiling system underlying the Nutri-Score label and cancer risk in Europe : Results from the EPIC prospective cohort study

Author

  • Mélanie Deschasaux
  • Inge Huybrechts
  • Neil Murphy
  • Chantal Julia
  • Serge Hercberg
  • Bernard Srour
  • Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot
  • Paule Latino-Martel
  • Carine Biessy
  • Corinne Casagrande
  • Mazda Jenab
  • Heather Ward
  • Elisabete Weiderpass
  • Christina C. Dahm
  • Kim Overvad
  • Cecilie Kyrø
  • Anja Olsen
  • Aurélie Affret
  • Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault
  • Yahya Mahamat-Saleh
  • Rudolf Kaaks
  • Tilman Kühn
  • Heiner Boeing
  • Lukas Schwingshackl
  • Christina Bamia
  • Eleni Peppa
  • Antonia Trichopoulou
  • Giovanna Masala
  • Vittorio Krogh
  • Salvatore Panico
  • Rosario Tumino
  • Carlotta Sacerdote
  • Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
  • Petra H. Peeters
  • Anette Hjartåker
  • Charlotta Rylander
  • Guri Skeie
  • J. Ramón Quirós
  • Paula Jakszyn
  • Elena Salamanca-Fernández
  • José María Huerta
  • Eva Ardanaz
  • Pilar Amiano
  • Ulrika Ericson
  • Emily Sonestedt
  • Ena Huseinovic
  • Ingegerd Johansson
  • Kay Tee Khaw
  • Nick Wareham
  • Kathryn E. Bradbury
  • Aurora Perez-Cornago
  • Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
  • Pietro Ferrari
  • Elio Riboli
  • Marc J. Gunter
  • Mathilde Touvier

Summary, in English

Background: Helping consumers make healthier food choices is a key issue for the prevention of cancer and other diseases. In many countries, political authorities are considering the implementation of a simplified labelling system to reflect the nutritional quality of food products. The Nutri-Score, a five-colour nutrition label, is derived from the Nutrient Profiling System of the British Food Standards Agency (modified version) (FSAm-NPS). How the consumption of foods with high/low FSAm-NPS relates to cancer risk has been studied in national/regional cohorts but has not been characterized in diverse European populations. Methods and findings: This prospective analysis included 471,495 adults from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC, 1992–2014, median follow-up: 15.3 y), among whom there were 49,794 incident cancer cases (main locations: breast, n = 12,063; prostate, n = 6,745; colon-rectum, n = 5,806). Usual food intakes were assessed with standardized country-specific diet assessment methods. The FSAm-NPS was calculated for each food/beverage using their 100-g content in energy, sugar, saturated fatty acid, sodium, fibres, proteins, and fruits/vegetables/legumes/nuts. The FSAm-NPS scores of all food items usually consumed by a participant were averaged to obtain the individual FSAm-NPS Dietary Index (DI) scores. Multi-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were computed. A higher FSAm-NPS DI score, reflecting a lower nutritional quality of the food consumed, was associated with a higher risk of total cancer (HRQ5 versus Q1 = 1.07; 95% CI 1.03–1.10, P-trend < 0.001). Absolute cancer rates in those with high and low (quintiles 5 and 1) FSAm-NPS DI scores were 81.4 and 69.5 cases/10,000 person-years, respectively. Higher FSAm-NPS DI scores were specifically associated with higher risks of cancers of the colon-rectum, upper aerodigestive tract and stomach, lung for men, and liver and postmenopausal breast for women (all P < 0.05). The main study limitation is that it was based on an observational cohort using self-reported dietary data obtained through a single baseline food frequency questionnaire; thus, exposure misclassification and residual confounding cannot be ruled out. Conclusions: In this large multinational European cohort, the consumption of food products with a higher FSAm-NPS score (lower nutritional quality) was associated with a higher risk of cancer. This supports the relevance of the FSAm-NPS as underlying nutrient profiling system for front-of-pack nutrition labels, as well as for other public health nutritional measures.

Department/s

  • Diabetes - Cardiovascular Disease
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
  • EXODIAB: Excellence in Diabetes Research in Sweden
  • Nutrition Epidemiology

Publishing year

2018

Language

English

Publication/Series

PLoS Medicine

Volume

15

Issue

9

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Topic

  • Cancer and Oncology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Status

Published

Research group

  • Diabetes - Cardiovascular Disease
  • Nutrition Epidemiology

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1549-1676