The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Ulrika Ericson

Ulrika Ericson

Associate professor

Ulrika Ericson

Comparing Self-Reported Sugar Intake With the Sucrose and Fructose Biomarker From Overnight Urine Samples in Relation to Cardiometabolic Risk Factors


  • Stina Ramne
  • Nicola Gray
  • Sophie Hellstrand
  • Louise Brunkwall
  • Sofia Enhörning
  • Peter M Nilsson
  • Gunnar Engström
  • Marju Orho-Melander
  • Ulrika Ericson
  • Gunter G C Kuhnle
  • Emily Sonestedt

Summary, in English

Studies on sugar intake and its link to cardiometabolic risk show inconsistent results, partly due to dietary misreporting. Cost-effective and easily measured nutritional biomarkers that can complement dietary data are warranted. Measurement of 24-h urinary sugars is a biomarker of sugar intake, but there are knowledge gaps regarding the use of overnight urine samples. We aim to compare (1) overnight urinary sucrose and fructose measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, (2) self-reported sugar intake measured with web-based 4-day food records, (3) their composite measure, and (4) these different measures' (1-3) cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic risk factors in 991 adults in the Malmö Offspring Study (18-69 years, 54% women). The correlations between the reported intakes of total sugar, added sugar and sucrose was higher for urinary sucrose than fructose, and the correlations for the sum or urinary sucrose and fructose (U-sugars) varied between r≈0.2-0.3 (P < 0.01) in men and women. Differences in the direction of associations were observed for some cardiometabolic risk factors between U-sugars and reported added sugar intake, as well as between the sexes. In women, U-sugars, but not reported added sugar intake, were positively associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure and fasting glucose. Both U-sugars and added sugar were positively associated with BMI and waist circumference in women, whereas among men, U-sugars were negatively associated with BMI and waist circumference, and no association was observed for added sugar. The composite measure of added sugars and U-sugars was positively associated with BMI, waist circumference and systolic blood pressure and negatively associated with HDL cholesterol in women (P < 0.05). Conclusively, we demonstrate statistically significant, but not very high, correlations between reported sugar intakes and U-sugars. Results indicate that overnight urinary sugars may be used as a complement to self-reported dietary data when investigating associations between sugar exposure and cardiometabolic risk. However, future studies are highly needed to validate the overnight urinary sugars as a biomarker because its use, instead of 24-h urine, facilitates data collection.


  • Nutrition Epidemiology
  • Diabetes - Cardiovascular Disease
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
  • EXODIAB: Excellence of Diabetes Research in Sweden
  • Perinatal and cardiovascular epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Research - Hypertension
  • Internal Medicine - Epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Research - Epidemiology

Publishing year





Frontiers in nutrition



Document type

Journal article


Frontiers Media S. A.


  • Endocrinology and Diabetes




  • Sugar consumption and cardiometabolic risk

Research group

  • Nutrition Epidemiology
  • Diabetes - Cardiovascular Disease
  • Perinatal and cardiovascular epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Research - Hypertension
  • Internal Medicine - Epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Research - Epidemiology


  • ISSN: 2296-861X