The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Gustav Smith

Associate professor

Default user image.

Right ventricular stroke work index by echocardiography in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension


  • Raluca Jumatate
  • Annika Ingvarsson
  • Gustav Jan Smith
  • Anders Roijer
  • Ellen Ostenfeld
  • Johan Waktare
  • Göran Rådegran
  • Carl Meurling
  • Anna Werther Evaldsson

Summary, in English

BACKGROUND: In adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), right ventricular (RV) failure may worsen rapidly, resulting in a poor prognosis. In this population, non-invasive assessment of RV function is challenging. RV stroke work index (RVSWI) measured by right heart catheterization (RHC) represents a promising index for RV function. The aim of the present study was to comprehensively evaluate non-invasive measures to calculate RVSWI derived by echocardiography (RVSWIECHO) using RHC (RVSWIRHC) as a reference in adult PAH patients.

METHODS: Retrospectively, 54 consecutive treatment naïve patients with PAH (65 ± 13 years, 36 women) were analyzed. Echocardiography and RHC were performed within a median of 1 day [IQR 0-1 days]. RVSWIRHC was calculated as: (mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)-mean right atrial pressure (mRAP)) x stroke volume index (SVI)RHC. Four methods for RVSWIECHO were evaluated: RVSWIECHO-1 = Tricuspid regurgitant maximum pressure gradient (TRmaxPG) x SVIECHO, RVSWIECHO-2 = (TRmaxPG-mRAPECHO) x SVIECHO, RVSWIECHO-3 = TR mean gradient (TRmeanPG) x SVIECHO and RVSWIECHO-4 = (TRmeanPG-mRAPECHO) x SVIECHO. Estimation of mRAPECHO was derived from inferior vena cava diameter.

RESULTS: RVSWIRHC was 1132 ± 352 mmHg*mL*m-2. In comparison with RVSWIRHC in absolute values, RVSWIECHO-1 and RVSWIECHO-2 was significantly higher (p < 0.001), whereas RVSWIECHO-4 was lower (p < 0.001). No difference was shown for RVSWIECHO-3 (p = 0.304). The strongest correlation, with RVSWIRHC, was demonstrated for RVSWIECHO-2 (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and RVSWIECHO-1 ( r = 0.75, p < 0.001). RVSWIECHO-3 and RVSWIECHO-4 had moderate correlation (r = 0.66 and r = 0.69, p < 0.001 for all). A good agreement (ICC) was demonstrated for RVSWIECHO-3 (ICC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.88, p < 0.001), a moderate for RVSWIECHO-4 (ICC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.27-0.87, p < 0.001) and RVSWIECHO-2 (ICC = 0.55, 95% CI - 0.21-0.83, p < 0.001). A poor ICC was demonstrated for RVSWIECHO-1 (ICC = 0.45, 95% CI - 0.18-0.77, p < 0.001). Agreement of absolute values for RVSWIECHO-1 was - 772 ± 385 (- 50 ± 20%) mmHg*mL*m-2, RVSWIECHO-2 - 600 ± 339 (-41 ± 20%) mmHg*mL*m-2, RVSWIECHO-3 42 ± 286 (5 ± 25%) mmHg*mL*m-2 and for RVSWIECHO-4 214 ± 273 (23 ± 27%) mmHg*mL*m-2.

CONCLUSION: The correlation with RVSWIRHC was moderate to strong for all echocardiographic measures, whereas only RVSWIECHO-3 displayed high concordance of absolute values. The results, however, suggest that RVSWIECHO-1 or RVSWIECHO-3 could be the preferable echocardiographic methods. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical utility of such measures in relation to treatment response, risk stratification and prognosis in patients with PAH.


  • Cardiology
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
  • EXODIAB: Excellence of Diabetes Research in Sweden
  • Clinical Physiology (Lund)
  • Lund Cardiac MR Group

Publishing year





BMC Cardiovascular Disorders





Document type

Journal article


BioMed Central (BMC)


  • Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems


  • Aged
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/complications
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnostic imaging
  • Ventricular Function, Right



Research group

  • Lund Cardiac MR Group


  • ISSN: 1471-2261