Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Giuseppe Giordano

Researcher

Default user image.

Sharing data for future research—engaging participants’ views about data governance beyond the original project : a DIRECT Study

Author

  • Nisha Shah
  • Victoria Coathup
  • Harriet Teare
  • Ian Forgie
  • Giuseppe Nicola Giordano
  • Tue Haldor Hansen
  • Lenka Groeneveld
  • Michelle Hudson
  • Ewan Pearson
  • Hartmut Ruetten
  • Jane Kaye

Summary, in English

Purpose: Biomedical data governance strategies should ensure that data are collected, stored, and used ethically and lawfully. However, research participants’ preferences for how data should be governed is least studied. The Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification (DIRECT) project collected substantial amounts of health and genetic information from patients at risk of, and with type II diabetes. We conducted a survey to understand participants’ future data governance preferences. Results will inform the postproject data governance strategy. Methods: A survey was distributed in Denmark, Sweden, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Results: In total 855 surveys were returned. Ninety-seven percent were supportive of sharing data postproject, and 90% were happy to share data with universities, and 56% with commercial companies. The top three priorities for data sharing were highly secure database, DIRECT researchers to monitor data used by other researchers, and researchers cannot identify participants. Respondents frequently suggested that a postproject Data Access Committee should involve a DIRECT researcher, diabetes clinician, patient representative, and a DIRECT participant. Conclusion: Preferences of how data should be governed, and what data could be shared and with whom varied between countries. Researchers are considered as key custodians of participant data. Engaging participants aids in designing governance to support their choices.

Department/s

  • Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
  • EXODIAB: Excellence in Diabetes Research in Sweden

Publishing year

2019

Language

English

Pages

1131-1138

Publication/Series

Genetics in Medicine

Volume

21

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Topic

  • Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Keywords

  • data governance
  • data sharing
  • ethics
  • patient involvement
  • type II diabetes

Status

Published

Research group

  • Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1098-3600