The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Florentina Negoita

Visiting research fellow

Default user image.

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)


  • D.J. Klionsky
  • S. Aits
  • J. Jakobsson
  • F. Negoita
  • K. Pircs
  • C.-K. Tong

Summary, in English

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.


  • Cell Death, Lysosomes and Artificial Intelligence
  • LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
  • Molecular Neurogenetics
  • StemTherapy: National Initiative on Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapy
  • MultiPark: Multidisciplinary research focused on Parkinson´s disease
  • Protein Phosphorylation

Publishing year












Document type

Journal article


Landes Bioscience


  • Cell and Molecular Biology
  • Medical Biotechnology
  • Bioinformatics and Systems Biology


  • Animals
  • Autophagosomes
  • Autophagy/physiology
  • Autophagy-Related Proteins/metabolism
  • Biological Assay/standards
  • Biomarkers
  • Humans
  • Lysosomes




  • Environmental toxins as cause of lysosomal damage-induced cell death in animals and humans
  • Lysosomes in cell death - from molecular mechanisms to new treatment strategies

Research group

  • Cell Death, Lysosomes and Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Neurogenetics
  • Protein Phosphorylation


  • ISSN: 1554-8635