The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Emily Sonestedt

Emily Sonestedt

Associate senior lecturer

Emily Sonestedt

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of coronary heart disease : a pan-European cohort study


  • Sabina Sieri
  • Claudia Agnoli
  • Sara Grioni
  • Elisabete Weiderpass
  • Amalia Mattiello
  • Ivonne Sluijs
  • Maria Jose Sanchez
  • Marianne Uhre Jakobsen
  • Michael Sweeting
  • Yvonne T. van der Schouw
  • Lena Maria Nilsson
  • Patrik Wennberg
  • Verena A. Katzke
  • Tilman Kühn
  • Kim Overvad
  • Tammy Y.N. Tong
  • Moreno Iribas Conchi
  • José Ramón Quirós
  • Juan Manuel García-Torrecillas
  • Olatz Mokoroa
  • Jesús Humberto Gómez
  • Anne Tjønneland
  • Emiliy Sonestedt
  • Antonia Trichopoulou
  • Anna Karakatsani
  • Elissavet Valanou
  • Jolanda M.A. Boer
  • W. M.Monique Verschuren
  • Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault
  • Guy Fagherazzi
  • Anne Laure Madika
  • Manuela M. Bergmann
  • Matthias B. Schulze
  • Pietro Ferrari
  • Heinz Freisling
  • Hannah Lennon
  • Carlotta Sacerdote
  • Giovanna Masala
  • Rosario Tumino
  • Elio Riboli
  • Nicholas J. Wareham
  • John Danesh
  • Nita G. Forouhi
  • Adam S. Butterworth
  • Vittorio Krogh

Summary, in English

BACKGROUND: High carbohydrate intake raises blood triglycerides, glucose, and insulin; reduces HDLs; and may increase risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Epidemiological studies indicate that high dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are associated with increased CHD risk. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether dietary GI, GL, and available carbohydrates are associated with CHD risk in both sexes. METHODS: This large prospective study-the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-consisted of 338,325 participants who completed a dietary questionnaire. HRs with 95% CIs for a CHD event, in relation to intake of GI, GL, and carbohydrates, were estimated using covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: After 12.8 y (median), 6378 participants had experienced a CHD event. High GL was associated with greater CHD risk [HR 1.16 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.31) highest vs. lowest quintile, p-trend 0.035; HR 1.18 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.29) per 50 g/day of GL intake]. The association between GL and CHD risk was evident in subjects with BMI (in kg/m2) ≥25 [HR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.35) per 50 g/d] but not in those with BMI <25 [HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.22) per 50 g/d) (P-interaction = 0.022). The GL-CHD association did not differ between men [HR: 1.19 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.30) per 50 g/d] and women [HR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.40) per 50 g/d] (test for interaction not significant). GI was associated with CHD risk only in the continuous model [HR: 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.08) per 5 units/d]. High available carbohydrate was associated with greater CHD risk [HR: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.18) per 50 g/d]. High sugar intake was associated with greater CHD risk [HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.17) per 50 g/d]. CONCLUSIONS: This large pan-European study provides robust additional support for the hypothesis that a diet that induces a high glucose response is associated with greater CHD risk.


  • Nutrition Epidemiology
  • EXODIAB: Excellence of Diabetes Research in Sweden
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health

Publishing year







The American journal of clinical nutrition





Document type

Journal article


Oxford University Press


  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Cancer and Oncology


  • cohort study
  • coronary heart disease
  • EPIC study
  • EPIC-CVD study
  • glycemic index
  • glycemic load



Research group

  • Nutrition Epidemiology


  • ISSN: 1938-3207