Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Andreas Edsfeltdt

Andreas Edsfeldt

Associate professor

Andreas Edsfeltdt

Validation of a New Method for 2D Fusion Imaging Registration in a System Prepared Only for 3D


  • Andreas Edsfeldt
  • Björn Sonesson
  • Helena Rosén
  • Marcelo H. Petri
  • Kiattisak Hongku
  • Timothy Resch
  • Nuno V. Dias

Summary, in English

Purpose: To validate a new 2D-3D registration method of fusion imaging during aortic repair in a system prepared only for 3D-3D registration and to compare radiation doses and accuracy. Materials and Methods: The study involved 189 patients, including 94 patients (median age 70 years; 85 men) who underwent abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with 2D-3D fusion on an Artis zee imaging system and 95 EVAR patients (median age 70 years; 81 men) from a prior study who had 3D-3D registration done using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). For the 2D-3D registration, an offline CBCT of the empty operating table was imported into the intraoperative dataset and superimposed on the preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA). Then 2 intraoperative single-frame 2D images of the skeleton were aligned with the patient’s skeleton on the preoperative CTA to complete the registration process. A digital subtraction angiogram was done to correct any misalignment of the aortic CTA volume. Values are given as the median [interquartile range (IQR) Q1, Q3]. Results: The 2D-3D registration had an accuracy of 4.0 mm (IQR 3.0, 5.0) after bone matching compared with the final correction with DSA (78% within 5 mm). By applying the 2D-3D protocol the radiation exposure (dose area product) from the registration of the fusion image was significantly reduced compared with the 3D-3D registration [1.12 Gy∙cm2 (IQR 0.41, 2.14) vs 43.4 Gy∙cm2 (IQR 37.1, 49.0), respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: The new 2D-3D registration protocol based on 2 single-frame images avoids an intraoperative CBCT and can be used for fusion imaging registration in a system originally designed for 3D-3D only. This 2D-3D registration protocol is accurate and leads to a significant reduction in radiation exposure.


  • Cardiovascular Research - Translational Studies
  • EXODIAB: Excellence of Diabetes Research in Sweden
  • Vascular Diseases - Clinical Research

Publishing year







Journal of Endovascular Therapy





Document type

Journal article


International Society of Endovascular Specialists


  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging


  • computed tomography angiography
  • cone beam computed tomography
  • endovascular aneurysm repair
  • fusion imaging
  • procedure guidance
  • radiation exposure
  • registration protocol



Research group

  • Cardiovascular Research - Translational Studies
  • Vascular Diseases - Clinical Research


  • ISSN: 1526-6028