Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Åke Lernmark

Principal investigator

Default user image.

Improved specificity of ICA assays in the Fourth International Immunology of Diabetes Serum Exchange Workshop

Author

  • C. J. Greenbaum
  • J. P. Palmer
  • S. Nagataki
  • Y. Yamaguchi
  • J. L. Molenaar
  • W. A.M. Van Beers
  • N. K. Maclaren
  • A. Lernmark
  • A. A. Villena
  • J. Barbosa
  • C. DeBeaufort
  • D. Becker
  • F. Becker
  • C. Betterle
  • E. Bosi
  • G. F. Bottazzo
  • G. Bright
  • P. Colman
  • R. L. Dawkins

Summary, in English

The goal of the Fourth International Workshop for Standardization of ICA Measurements was to determine the specificity of ICA assays and their ability to distinguish between control sera (n = 57) and sera from IDDM-related individuals-representing relatives of IDDM patients (n = 21), healthy individuals who later developed IDDM (n = 8), or newly diagnosed IDDM patients (n = 23). Results from 28 laboratories were analyzed. The mean specificity (percentage of control sera reported as negative) among 27 laboratories was 91%, including 6 laboratories with 100% specificity. Nevertheless, 78% of laboratories found at least one control sample >0 JDF U. Among samples from first-degree relatives, the mean concordance was 86%, including three sera found negative (0 JDF U) by all laboratories. Among individuals who later developed diabetes, the mean concordance was 93%, with two sera found positive by 100% of laboratories. In sera from newly diagnosed IDDM patients, the mean concordance was 82%. Three sera were found positive and one serum negative by all laboratories. The JDF U of the sera considered to be positive were significantly greater than each laboratory's average for the controls. In conclusion, the results from laboratories participating in the Fourth International ICA Workshop demonstrated excellent specificity, good concordance, and an ability to separate control sera from defined, IDDM- related subjects.

Publishing year

1992-01-01

Language

English

Pages

1570-1574

Publication/Series

Diabetes

Volume

41

Issue

12

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

American Diabetes Association Inc.

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0012-1797